On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 09:37:15AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 05:07:50PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 05:00:50PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:41:36PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > Now that the page table allocator can free page table allocations > > > > smaller than PAGE_SIZE, reduce the size of the PMD and PTE allocations > > > > to avoid needlessly wasting memory. > > > > > > > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net> > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> > > > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org> > > > > > > Something in the sparc32 patches in linux-next causes all my sparc32 > > > emulations > > > to crash. bisect points to this patch, but reverting it doesn't help, and > > > neither > > > does reverting the rest of the series. > > > > > Actually, turns out I see the same pattern (lots of scheduling while atomic > > followed by 'killing interrupt handler' in cryptomgr_test) with several > > powerpc boot tests. I am currently bisecting those crashes. I'll report > > the results here as well as soon as I have it. > > FWIW, I retested my sparc32 patches with PREEMPT=y and I don't see any > issues. However, linux-next is a different story, where I don't get very far > at all: > > BUG: Bad page state in process swapper pfn:005b4 > > If you're seeing this on powerpc too, I wonder if it's related to: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200514170327.31389-1-r...@kernel.org > > since I think it just hit -next and the diffstat is all over the place. I've > added Mike to CC just in case.
Thanks, Will, I'll take a look. > Will -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
