The Subject was "Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: simple-card: care missing
address #address-cells"
Hi Rob
I'm trying to create v2 of simple-card patch,
And got issue which I can't solve by myself.
I think "xxx,yyy" (= which has "," at the property name)
needs special care, but it is very un-understandable...
Now, I'm give up.
So, can I ask you 2 things about Yaml Doc "xxx,yyy" type property ?
========================
1) reference own definitions from "xxx,yyy"
========================
I guess "xxx,yyy" naming property needs to has "description", right ?
But, it is OK if it references "/schemas/xxxx"
--- OK ------
xxx,yyy:
description: xxx
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
-------------
but, will be error if it references own definitions
--- NG ------
xxx,yyy:
description: xxx
$ref: "#/definitions/mydef"
-------------
This is the related error
-- error(?) --
xxx.yaml: properties:xxx,yyy:\
$ref: '#/definitions/mydef' does not match
'types.yaml#[/]{0,1}definitions/.*'
--------------
# but, there is no problem if it was defined as "patternProperties"
Q. The "xxx,yyy" property can't references own definitions,
or needs some magical extra settings ??
========================
2) phandle for "xxx,yyy"
========================
I noticed that it seems "xxx,yyy" property can't be referenced.
Here, "xxx,yyy" has "type: object" and "additionalProperties: false"
(below didn't happen if it doesn't have "additionalProperties: false")
If "xxx,yyy" has phandle, but not referenced,
This is not a problem.
--- OK ---
...
foo = <&bar>;
...
xxx_yyy: xxx,yyy {
...
};
--------------
But will be error if it is referenced.
--- NG ---
foo = <&xxx_yyy>;
...
xxx_yyy: xxx,yyy {
...
};
------------
The error is
-- error ---
xxx.yaml: xxx.yyy: \
Additional properties are not allowed ('phandle' was unexpected)
------------
Q. The "xxx,yyy" needs magical settings to be referenced, or can't be ?
