On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:03:13AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 5/31/20 5:20 AM, Rob Landley wrote: > > On 5/30/20 3:08 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >> On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > >>> Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for > >>> the purpose of being the canonical place for linux-next to pull from, > >>> due to policies around pgp keys and nobody following up on signing > >>> mine. This is all really silly since there are ridiculously many > >>> independent channels I could cryptographically validate identity > >>> through with vanishing probability that they're all compromised. For > >>> the time being I'll reactivate my repo on git.musl-libc.org. > >> > >> May I suggest to pick up these patches, for example? There might be > >> more I missed, but getting these merged should already help a lot with > >> the clean-up of arch/sh. > > > > Does that include the 2 fixes to build with current binutils I made puppy > > eyes > > about last -rc7 (in march)? > > > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=158544749818664&w=2 > Yes, listed as "[PATCH 1/2] arch/sh: vmlinux.scr". > > @Rich: Do you think you can merge all those fixes in your local tree within > the next days and send a PR to Linus? > > Otherwise, I can volunteer to become a third maintainer for arch/sh as I have > the hardware for testing and can accept patches and send PRs. > > We shouldn't let contributors to arch/sh wait for too long.
Yes, I'll try to get my tree ready for next/PR use tomorrow. Rich