From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.com> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:23:09 +0300
> On 01/06/2020 21:06, David Miller wrote: >> From: patrickeigens...@gmail.com >> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:12:01 +0200 >> >>> From: Patrick Eigensatz <patrickeigens...@gmail.com> >>> >>> After allocating the spare nexthop group it should be tested for kzalloc() >>> returning NULL, instead the already used nexthop group (which cannot be >>> NULL at this point) had been tested so far. >>> >>> Additionally, if kzalloc() fails, return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) instead of NULL. >>> >>> Coverity-id: 1463885 >>> Reported-by: Coverity <scan-ad...@coverity.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Eigensatz <patrickeigens...@gmail.com> >> >> Applied, thank you. >> > > Hi Dave, > I see this patch in -net-next but it should've been in -net as I wrote in my > review[1]. This patch should go along with the recent nexthop set that fixes > a few bugs, since it could result in a null ptr deref if the spare group > cannot > be allocated. > How would you like to proceed? Should it be submitted for -net as well? When I'm leading up to the merge window I just toss everything into net-next and still queue things to -stable as needed.
