On Fri 05-06-20 12:43:54, Dan Carpenter wrote: > I wonder if maybe the best fix is to re-add the "if (!res) " check back > to blkdev_get().
Well, it won't be that simple since we need to call bd_abort_claiming()
under bdev->bd_mutex. And the fact that __blkdev_get() frees the reference
you pass to it is somewhat subtle and surprising so I think we are better
off getting rid of that.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
