On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 2:46 PM Alan Maguire <[email protected]> wrote: > > A recent RFC patch set [1] suggests some additional functionality > may be needed around kunit resources. It seems to require > > 1. support for resources without allocation > 2. support for lookup of such resources > 3. support for access to resources across multiple kernel threads > > The proposed changes here are designed to address these needs. > The idea is we first generalize the API to support adding > resources with static data; then from there we support named > resources. The latter support is needed because if we are > in a different thread context and only have the "struct kunit *" > to work with, we need a way to identify a resource in lookup. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 > > Changes since v3: > - removed unused "init" field from "struct kunit_resources" (Brendan)
Shuah, it looks like you haven't sent a PR to Linus yet. Would you mind picking this up for 5.8?
