On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:56 AM Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:14:03PM +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote: > > 'seq_buf' provides a very useful abstraction for writing to a string > > buffer without needing to worry about it over-flowing. However even > > though the API has been stable for couple of years now its still not > > exported to kernel loadable modules limiting its usage. > > > > Hence this patch proposes update to 'seq_buf.c' to mark > > seq_buf_printf() which is part of the seq_buf API to be exported to > > kernel loadable GPL modules. This symbol will be used in later parts > > of this patch-set to simplify content creation for a sysfs attribute. > > > > Cc: Piotr Maziarz <piotrx.mazi...@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojew...@intel.com> > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org> > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> > > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rost...@goodmis.org> > > Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaib...@linux.ibm.com> > > --- > > Changelog: > > > > v12..v13: > > * None > > > > v11..v12: > > * None > > Can you please resend your patchset once a week like everyone else and > not flood inboxes with it?
Hi Boris, I gave Vaibhav some long shot hope that his series could be included in my libnvdimm pull request for -rc1. Save for a last minute clang report that I misread as a gcc warning, I likely would have included. This spin is looking to address the last of the comments I had and something I would consider for -rc2. So, in this case the resends were requested by me and I'll take the grumbles on Vaibhav's behalf.