On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 07:01:08PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
SNIP
> >>
> >> Well, ok.
> >>
> >> I will rename process_interval() to __process_interval() and
> >> then print_interval() to process_interval().
> >>
> >> Regarding timeout let's have it like this:
> >>
> >> static bool process_timeout(int timeout)
> >> {
> >> return timeout ? true : false;
> >> }
> >
> > can't this just stay as value check after finished poll?
> >
> > if (timeout)
> > break;
> >
> > and then separate call to process_interval(interval, times)?
>
> Like this? Still makes sense to have it in a single function.
>
> static bool process_timing_settings(int timeout, unsigned int interval, int
> *times)
> {
> bool res = timeout ? true : false;
> if (!res)
> res = process_interval(interval, times);
> return res;
> }
I don't see the connection between timeout and interval
IMO this just complicates things, is there a problem to
keep it separated as it is now?
jirka
>
> ~Alexey
>
