On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:05 PM Souptick Joarder <jrdr.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:22 AM Souptick Joarder <jrdr.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > First, when memory allocation for sg_list_unaligned failed, there
> > is no point of calling put_pages() as we haven't pinned any pages.
> >
> > Second, if get_user_pages_fast() failed we should unpinned num_pinned
> > pages, no point of checking till num_pages.
> >
> > This will address both.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.li...@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
> > Cc: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>
>
> Any suggestion, what is the right tree to take this patch forward ?
If no further comment, can we get this patch in queue for 5.9 ?
>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > Added review tag.
> >
> > drivers/virt/fsl_hypervisor.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virt/fsl_hypervisor.c b/drivers/virt/fsl_hypervisor.c
> > index 1b0b11b..ea344d7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virt/fsl_hypervisor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virt/fsl_hypervisor.c
> > @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static long ioctl_memcpy(struct fsl_hv_ioctl_memcpy
> > __user *p)
> >
> > unsigned int i;
> > long ret = 0;
> > - int num_pinned; /* return value from get_user_pages() */
> > + int num_pinned = 0; /* return value from get_user_pages() */
> > phys_addr_t remote_paddr; /* The next address in the remote buffer
> > */
> > uint32_t count; /* The number of bytes left to copy */
> >
> > @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static long ioctl_memcpy(struct fsl_hv_ioctl_memcpy
> > __user *p)
> >
> > exit:
> > if (pages) {
> > - for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++)
> > + for (i = 0; i < num_pinned; i++)
> > if (pages[i])
> > put_page(pages[i]);
> > }
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
