On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 5:59 PM Alex Shi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Now pgdat.lru_lock was replaced by lruvec lock. It's not used anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
>  include/linux/mmzone.h | 1 -
>  mm/page_alloc.c        | 1 -
>  2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 36c1680efd90..8d7318ce5f62 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -735,7 +735,6 @@ struct deferred_split {
>
>         /* Write-intensive fields used by page reclaim */
>         ZONE_PADDING(_pad1_)
> -       spinlock_t              lru_lock;
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT
>         /*
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index e028b87ce294..4d7df42b32d6 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -6721,7 +6721,6 @@ static void __meminit pgdat_init_internals(struct 
> pglist_data *pgdat)
>         init_waitqueue_head(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait);
>
>         pgdat_page_ext_init(pgdat);
> -       spin_lock_init(&pgdat->lru_lock);
>         lruvec_init(&pgdat->__lruvec);
>  }
>

This patch would probably make more sense as part of patch 18 since
you removed all of the users of this field there.

Reply via email to