The checking is_migration_entry() and is_hwpoison_entry() are stricter
than non_swap_entry(), means they have covered the conditional check
which non_swap_entry() is doing.

Hence remove the unnecessary non_swap_entry() in is_hugetlb_entry_migration()
and is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned() to simplify code.

Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.krav...@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 3569e731e66b..c14837854392 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3748,7 +3748,7 @@ bool is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte_t pte)
        if (huge_pte_none(pte) || pte_present(pte))
                return false;
        swp = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
-       if (non_swap_entry(swp) && is_migration_entry(swp))
+       if (is_migration_entry(swp))
                return true;
        else
                return false;
@@ -3761,7 +3761,7 @@ static bool is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(pte_t pte)
        if (huge_pte_none(pte) || pte_present(pte))
                return false;
        swp = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
-       if (non_swap_entry(swp) && is_hwpoison_entry(swp))
+       if (is_hwpoison_entry(swp))
                return true;
        else
                return false;
-- 
2.17.2

Reply via email to