Hi Jason,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 10:35 AM
> To: Dey, Megha <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jiang, Dave <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Pan, Jacob
> jun <[email protected]>; Raj, Ashok <[email protected]>; Liu, Yi L
> <[email protected]>; Lu, Baolu <[email protected]>; Tian, Kevin
> <[email protected]>; Kumar, Sanjay K <[email protected]>; Luck,
> Tony <[email protected]>; Lin, Jing <[email protected]>; Williams, Dan J
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Hansen, Dave <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Ortiz, Samuel <[email protected]>; Hossain, Mona
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 04/18] irq/dev-msi: Introduce APIs to allocate/free
> dev-msi interrupts
> 
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:05:52AM -0700, Dey, Megha wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/21/2020 9:25 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:02:41AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> > > > From: Megha Dey <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > The dev-msi interrupts are to be allocated/freed only for custom
> > > > devices, not standard PCI-MSIX devices.
> > > >
> > > > These interrupts are device-defined and they are distinct from the
> > > > already existing msi interrupts:
> > > > pci-msi: Standard PCI MSI/MSI-X setup format
> > > > platform-msi: Platform custom, but device-driver opaque MSI
> > > > setup/control
> > > > arch-msi: fallback for devices not assigned to the generic PCI
> > > > domain
> > > > dev-msi: device defined IRQ domain for ancillary devices. For e.g.
> > > > DSA portal devices use device specific IMS(Interrupt message store)
> interrupts.
> > > >
> > > > dev-msi interrupts are represented by their own device-type. That
> > > > means
> > > > dev->msi_list is never contended for different interrupt types. It
> > > > will either be all PCI-MSI or all device-defined.
> > >
> > > Not sure I follow this, where is the enforcement that only dev-msi
> > > or normal MSI is being used at one time on a single struct device?
> > >
> >
> > So, in the dev_msi_alloc_irqs, I first check if the dev_is_pci..
> > If it is a pci device, it is forbidden to use dev-msi and must use the
> > pci subsystem calls. dev-msi is to be used for all other custom
> > devices, mdev or otherwise.
> 
> What prevents creating a dev-msi directly on the struct pci_device ?

In the next patchset, I have explicitly added code which denies PCI devices 
from using the dev_msi alloc/free APIS
> 
> Jason

Reply via email to