* Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 6:35 AM Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > * kernel test robot <rong.a.c...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Greeting,
> > >
> > > FYI, we noticed a -43.3% regression of fio.read_iops due to commit:
> > >
> > >
> > > commit: a0ac629ebe7b3d248cb93807782a00d9142fdb98 ("x86/copy_mc: Introduce
> > > copy_mc_generic()")
> > > url:
> > > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Dan-Williams/Renovate-memcpy_mcsafe-with-copy_mc_to_-user-kernel/20200802-014046
> > >
> > >
> > > in testcase: fio-basic
> > > on test machine: 96 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with
> > > 256G memory
> > > with following parameters:
> >
> > So this performance regression, if it isn't a spurious result, looks
> > concerning. Is this expected?
>
> This is not expected and I think delays these patches until I'm back
> from leave in a few weeks. I know that we might lose some inlining
> effect due to replacing native memcpy, but I did not expect it would
> have an impact like this. In my testing I was seeing a performance
> improvement from replacing the careful / open-coded copy with rep;
> mov;, which increases the surprise of this result.
It would be nice to double check this on the kernel-test-robot side as
well, to make sure it's not a false positive.
Thanks,
Ingo
