On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 22:09, Vincent Guittot <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 15:44, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > That's been said, not compensating the vruntime for a sched_idle task > > > makes sense for me. Even if that will only help for others task in the > > > same cfs_rq > > > > Yeah, but it is worth the extra pointer chasing and branches? > > For that I let Jiang provides figures to show the worthful I'll try to have some tests and show the wakeup latency difference after applying the patch later.
Thanks for your time. Regards Jiang > > > > > Then again, I suppose we started all that with the idle_h_nr_running > > nonsense :/
