On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 7:06 PM Paul A. Clarke <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 09:26:40AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 5:43 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Em Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:20:42AM +0530, kajoljain escreveu: > > > > On 8/14/20 9:13 AM, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 3:21 PM Paul A. Clarke <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> These changes take advantage of the new capability added in > > > > >> merge commit 00e4db51259a5f936fec1424b884f029479d3981 > > > > >> "Allow using computed metrics in calculating other metrics". > > > > >> > > > > >> The net is a simplification of the expressions for a handful > > > > >> of metrics, but no functional change. > > > > >> > > > > >> Signed-off-by: Paul A. Clarke <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > The patch looks good to me. > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain<[email protected]> > > > > > > Thanks, applied. Added Ian's Acked-by as well. > > > > I've synced perf and testing on a remote machine (not easy for me to > > log into) I see failures in perf test "10.3: Parsing of PMU event > > table metrics" like: > > ... > > parsing metric: dfu_stall_cpi - dflong_stall_cpi > > Parse event failed metric 'dfu_other_stall_cpi' id 'dflong_stall_cpi' > > expr 'dfu_stall_cpi - dflong_stall_cpi' > > Error string 'parser error' help '(null)' > > Parse event failed metric 'dfu_other_stall_cpi' id 'dfu_stall_cpi' > > expr 'dfu_stall_cpi - dflong_stall_cpi' > > Error string 'parser error' help '(null)' > > ... > > > > This may be that the test doesn't handle the metric in terms of metric > > addition and so I'll look for a fix. I thought I'd send a heads up in > > case you had already seen/addressed this. Is perf test on PowerPC > > clean for you at the moment? > > I see these errors as well (on 5.9-rc2). Each error seems to be for the > newer metrics that take advantage of the newer functionality, including > the metrics I changed recently, and Kajol's 24x7 and nest metrics. > > Thanks for the heads up! I confess I had not seen the errors only because > I wasn't looking. :-/
No worries, if we create a similar Intel metric it will likely exhibit a similar issue in the test. Arnaldo and I have wondered about having an all architectures mode for jevents to make it easier to test cases like this. As my PowerPC set up is a bit special it is great that you've confirmed this isn't at fault :-) I'll try to get time to dig a little further. Thanks, Ian > PC
