At seqlock.h, the following set of functions:

    - __seqcount_ptr()
    - __seqcount_preemptible()
    - __seqcount_assert()

act as plain seqcount_t "property" accessors. Meanwhile, the following
group:

    - __seqcount_ptr()
    - __seqcount_lock_preemptible()
    - __seqcount_assert_lock_held()

act as the equivalent set, but in the generic form, taking either
seqcount_t or any of the seqcount_LOCKTYPE_t variants.

This is quite confusing, especially the first member where it is called
exactly the same in both groups.

Differentiate the first group by using "__seqcount_t_" as prefix. This
also conforms with the rest of seqlock.h naming conventions.

While at it, also constify the property accessors first parameter where
appropriate.

References: 55f3560df975 ("seqlock: Extend seqcount API with associated locks")
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darw...@linutronix.de>
---
 include/linux/seqlock.h | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index 598af597f74e..5470e9cd52ce 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -183,13 +183,13 @@ __seqcount_##locktype##_ptr(seqcount_##locktype##_t *s)   
                \
 }                                                                      \
                                                                        \
 static __always_inline bool                                            \
-__seqcount_##locktype##_preemptible(seqcount_##locktype##_t *s)                
\
+__seqcount_##locktype##_preemptible(const seqcount_##locktype##_t *s)  \
 {                                                                      \
        return preemptible;                                             \
 }                                                                      \
                                                                        \
 static __always_inline void                                            \
-__seqcount_##locktype##_assert(seqcount_##locktype##_t *s)             \
+__seqcount_##locktype##_assert(const seqcount_##locktype##_t *s)       \
 {                                                                      \
        __SEQ_LOCK(lockdep_assert_held(lockmember));                    \
 }
@@ -198,17 +198,17 @@ __seqcount_##locktype##_assert(seqcount_##locktype##_t 
*s)                \
  * __seqprop() for seqcount_t
  */
 
-static inline seqcount_t *__seqcount_ptr(seqcount_t *s)
+static inline seqcount_t *__seqcount_t_ptr(seqcount_t *s)
 {
        return s;
 }
 
-static inline bool __seqcount_preemptible(seqcount_t *s)
+static inline bool __seqcount_t_preemptible(const seqcount_t *s)
 {
        return false;
 }
 
-static inline void __seqcount_assert(seqcount_t *s)
+static inline void __seqcount_t_assert(const seqcount_t *s)
 {
        lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
 }
@@ -236,12 +236,11 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(ww_mutex,       struct ww_mutex,        
true,   &s->lock->base)
 #define SEQCNT_MUTEX_ZERO(name, lock)          SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO(name, 
lock)
 #define SEQCNT_WW_MUTEX_ZERO(name, lock)       SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO(name, 
lock)
 
-
 #define __seqprop_case(s, locktype, prop)                              \
        seqcount_##locktype##_t: __seqcount_##locktype##_##prop((void *)(s))
 
 #define __seqprop(s, prop) _Generic(*(s),                              \
-       seqcount_t:             __seqcount_##prop((void *)(s)),         \
+       seqcount_t:             __seqcount_t_##prop((void *)(s)),       \
        __seqprop_case((s),     raw_spinlock,   prop),                  \
        __seqprop_case((s),     spinlock,       prop),                  \
        __seqprop_case((s),     rwlock,         prop),                  \
-- 
2.28.0

Reply via email to