On 27-08-20, 08:33, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The commit d05a7238fe1c ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Unconditionally call
> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table()") works fine in the case where there is
> no OPP table. However, if there is an OPP table then
> dev_pm_opp_of_add_table() will return 0. Since 0 != -ENODEV then the
> "if (ret != -ENODEV)" will evaluate to true and we'll fall into the
> error case. Oops.
>
> Let's fix this.
>
> Fixes: d05a7238fe1c ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Unconditionally call
> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table()")
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index b7e47107a31a..55101dba42bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -2284,7 +2284,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> /* OPP table is optional */
> ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(&pdev->dev);
> - if (ret != -ENODEV) {
> + if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid OPP table in Device tree\n");
> goto opp_cleanup;
> }
Wow!
How many bugs did I introduce with a simple patch :(
@Ulf, since this is material for 5.10 I was planning to resend the
original patch itself with all the things fixed. Will you be able to
rebase your tree? Or do you want to apply fixes separately ?
--
viresh
