On Tuesday 13 November 2007, David Brownell wrote:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119463810905330&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119463811005344&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119463811105352&w=2
>
> Plus the appended tweak.
-ENOPATCH ... ;)
==========
Minor fixups to the gpiolib code.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
lib/gpiolib.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- g26.orig/lib/gpiolib.c 2007-11-12 15:06:45.000000000 -0800
+++ g26/lib/gpiolib.c 2007-11-12 15:07:36.000000000 -0800
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#define extra_checks 0
#endif
-/* gpio_lock protects the table of chips and to gpio_chip->requested.
+/* gpio_lock protects the table of chips and gpio_chip->requested.
* While any gpio is requested, its gpio_chip is not removable. It's
* a raw spinlock to ensure safe access from hardirq contexts, and to
* shrink bitbang overhead: per-bit preemption would be very wrong.
@@ -533,6 +533,6 @@ static int __init gpiolib_debugfs_init(v
NULL, NULL, &gpiolib_operations);
return 0;
}
-postcore_initcall(gpiolib_debugfs_init);
+subsys_initcall(gpiolib_debugfs_init);
#endif /* DEBUG_FS */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
