On Nov 14, 2007 11:30 AM, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 13 November 2007, eric miao wrote: > > > > Can we use "per gpio based" structure instead of "per gpio_chip" based > > > > one, > > > > just like what the generic IRQ layer is doing nowadays? > > > > > > We "can" do most anything. What would that improve though? > > ... What would that improve, though? Your followup posts > still don't answer that question for me. I see the code, > but don't have an answer to that question. >
to be honest, I don't feel like the holes. Put restrictions on the numbering of GPIOs might not be a good idea either. > > > -- Cheers - eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
