On (20/09/10 11:57), Hans Verkuil wrote:
> 
> Perhaps, but this patch is meant to revert *all* changes relating to
> V4L2_FLAG_MEMORY_NON_CONSISTENT. We don't want to have unused fields
> in the public API.

OK, would you prefer a squashed patch for all the kernel rollbacks and
cleanups or a patch series?

        -ss

Reply via email to