On 10/09/2020 12:14, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/09/10 11:57), Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps, but this patch is meant to revert *all* changes relating to
>> V4L2_FLAG_MEMORY_NON_CONSISTENT. We don't want to have unused fields
>> in the public API.
> 
> OK, would you prefer a squashed patch for all the kernel rollbacks and
> cleanups or a patch series?

My preference is a single patch.

Regards,

        Hans

Reply via email to