On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 14:40 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or
> > > > not.
> > > > I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
> > > > archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
> > > > patch.
> > > >
> > >
> > > The patch showed up in the archives within seconds:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulw...@gmail.com/
> > >
> > > So, the linux-usb list is most likely not moderated. Patch validated.
> >
> > Yes, it is not moderated, and never has been, no idea where that idea came
> > from.
>
> There's also linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org
> that is listed as moderated
>
> Are any of the vger lists actually moderated?
>
Joe, I found these five list entries with inconsistent remarks:
- linux-...@vger.kernel.org:
- Patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulw...@gmail.com/
(the patch here)
- linux-asp...@lists.ozlabs.org:
- Patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912183334.22683-1-lukas.bulw...@gmail.com/
- linux-media...@lists.infradead.org:
- Patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200914053110.23286-1-lukas.bulw...@gmail.com/
- initial patch here was wrong.
- waiting for somebody to confirm that it is not moderated to then
send the correct patch.
- linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org:
- Patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200914061353.17535-1-lukas.bulw...@gmail.com/
- linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org:
- by 'majority vote' (131 vs. 27), it is probably moderated.
- no patch sent yet; patch will follow once the others are accepted.
Then, more patches on adding 'exploders for non-subscribers' remarks will
follow.
Lukas
