On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 07:07:11PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 05:17:03PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > The x86 unification resulted in CONFIG_X86_HT no longer being
> > > set if (X86_32 && MK8).
> > Yup - my bad. I wrongly assumed MK8 was an X86_64 thing.
> >
> > Thanks for fixing this.
> > >
> > > After grep'ing through the tree I think the problem is that different
> > > places have different assumptions about the semantics of CONFIG_X86_HT,
> > > either:
> > > - hyperthreading or
> > > - multicore
> > > and the SCHED_SMT and SCHED_MC dependencies are just one of the
> > > symptoms.
> > >
> > > This should be sorted out properly, but until then we should keep the
> > > 2.6.23 status quo.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I assume Thomas & Co will forward the patch.
>
> After looking what does what and fixing it.
>
> Right now this patch is not a 1:1 replacement of the .23 status quo,
> as it now makes SCHED_SMT and SCHED_HT depend on !MK8 for 64bit.
I assumed this was intentional - Adrian?
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
