On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 01:00:14AM -0700, Yang Yang wrote:
> blk_exit_queue will free elevator_data, while blk_mq_run_work_fn
> will access it. Move cancel of hctx->run_work to the front of
> blk_exit_queue to avoid use-after-free.
> 
> Fixes: 1b97871b501f ("blk-mq: move cancel of hctx->run_work into 
> blk_mq_hw_sysfs_release")
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.y...@vivo.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq-sysfs.c | 2 --
>  block/blk-sysfs.c    | 9 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c b/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c
> index 062229395a50..7b52e7657b2d 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c
> @@ -36,8 +36,6 @@ static void blk_mq_hw_sysfs_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>       struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = container_of(kobj, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx,
>                                                 kobj);
>  
> -     cancel_delayed_work_sync(&hctx->run_work);
> -
>       if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)
>               cleanup_srcu_struct(hctx->srcu);
>       blk_free_flush_queue(hctx->fq);
> diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c
> index 7dda709f3ccb..8c6bafc801dd 100644
> --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c
> +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c
> @@ -934,9 +934,16 @@ static void blk_release_queue(struct kobject *kobj)
>  
>       blk_free_queue_stats(q->stats);
>  
> -     if (queue_is_mq(q))
> +     if (queue_is_mq(q)) {
> +             struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> +             int i;
> +
>               cancel_delayed_work_sync(&q->requeue_work);
>  
> +             queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i)
> +                     cancel_delayed_work_sync(&hctx->run_work);
> +     }
> +

Looks fine:

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming....@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Ming

Reply via email to