On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 08:52:03PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Peter suggested that using the exclusive mode in perf could
> avoid some problems with bad scheduling of groups. Exclusive
> is implemented in the kernel, but wasn't exposed by the perf tool,
> so hard to use without custom low level API users.
> 
> Add support for marking groups or events with :e for exclusive
> in the perf tool.  The implementation is basically the same as the
> existing pinned attribute.
> 
> Cc: pet...@infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt |  1 +
>  tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c        | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.c         |  9 +++-
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.l         |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt 
> b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt
> index 10ed539a8859..4c7db1da8fcc 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ counted. The following modifiers exist:
>   S - read sample value (PERF_SAMPLE_READ)
>   D - pin the event to the PMU
>   W - group is weak and will fallback to non-group if not schedulable,
> + e - group or event are exclusive and do not share the PMU
>  
>  The 'p' modifier can be used for specifying how precise the instruction
>  address should be. The 'p' modifier can be specified multiple times:
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
> index 7f9f87a470c3..7411dd4d76cf 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
> @@ -557,6 +557,7 @@ static int test__checkevent_pmu_events(struct evlist 
> *evlist)
>       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_hv", evsel->core.attr.exclude_hv);
>       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong precise_ip", !evsel->core.attr.precise_ip);
>       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong pinned", !evsel->core.attr.pinned);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclusive", !evsel->core.attr.exclusive);
>  
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -575,6 +576,7 @@ static int test__checkevent_pmu_events_mix(struct evlist 
> *evlist)
>       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_hv", evsel->core.attr.exclude_hv);
>       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong precise_ip", !evsel->core.attr.precise_ip);
>       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong pinned", !evsel->core.attr.pinned);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclusive", !evsel->core.attr.exclusive);
>  
>       /* cpu/pmu-event/u*/
>       evsel = evsel__next(evsel);
> @@ -587,6 +589,7 @@ static int test__checkevent_pmu_events_mix(struct evlist 
> *evlist)
>       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_hv", evsel->core.attr.exclude_hv);
>       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong precise_ip", !evsel->core.attr.precise_ip);
>       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong pinned", !evsel->core.attr.pinned);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclusive", !evsel->core.attr.pinned);
>  
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1277,6 +1280,49 @@ static int test__pinned_group(struct evlist *evlist)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int test__checkevent_exclusive_modifier(struct evlist *evlist)
> +{
> +     struct evsel *evsel = evlist__first(evlist);
> +
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_user", !evsel->core.attr.exclude_user);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_kernel", 
> evsel->core.attr.exclude_kernel);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_hv", evsel->core.attr.exclude_hv);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong precise_ip", evsel->core.attr.precise_ip);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclusive", evsel->core.attr.exclusive);
> +
> +     return test__checkevent_symbolic_name(evlist);
> +}
> +
> +static int test__exclusive_group(struct evlist *evlist)
> +{
> +     struct evsel *evsel, *leader;
> +
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong number of entries", 3 == 
> evlist->core.nr_entries);
> +
> +     /* cycles - group leader */
> +     evsel = leader = evlist__first(evlist);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong type", PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE == 
> evsel->core.attr.type);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config",
> +                     PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES == evsel->core.attr.config);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong group name", !evsel->group_name);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong leader", evsel->leader == leader);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclusive", evsel->core.attr.exclusive);
> +
> +     /* cache-misses - can not be pinned, but will go on with the leader */
> +     evsel = evsel__next(evsel);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong type", PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE == 
> evsel->core.attr.type);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config",
> +                     PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES == evsel->core.attr.config);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclusive", !evsel->core.attr.exclusive);
> +
> +     /* branch-misses - ditto */
> +     evsel = evsel__next(evsel);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config",
> +                     PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES == evsel->core.attr.config);
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclusive", !evsel->core.attr.exclusive);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
>  static int test__checkevent_breakpoint_len(struct evlist *evlist)
>  {
>       struct evsel *evsel = evlist__first(evlist);
> @@ -1765,7 +1811,17 @@ static struct evlist_test test__events[] = {
>               .name  = "cycles:k",
>               .check = test__sym_event_dc,
>               .id    = 55,
> -     }
> +     },
> +     {
> +             .name  = "instructions:uep",
> +             .check = test__checkevent_exclusive_modifier,
> +             .id    = 56,
> +     },
> +     {
> +             .name  = "{cycles,cache-misses,branch-misses}:e",
> +             .check = test__exclusive_group,
> +             .id    = 57,
> +     },
>  };
>  
>  static struct evlist_test test__events_pmu[] = {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> index 9f7260e69113..760506f7a87a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> @@ -1768,6 +1768,7 @@ struct event_modifier {
>       int sample_read;
>       int pinned;
>       int weak;
> +     int exclusive;
>  };
>  
>  static int get_event_modifier(struct event_modifier *mod, char *str,
> @@ -1783,6 +1784,7 @@ static int get_event_modifier(struct event_modifier 
> *mod, char *str,
>       int precise_max = 0;
>       int sample_read = 0;
>       int pinned = evsel ? evsel->core.attr.pinned : 0;
> +     int exclusive = evsel ? evsel->core.attr.exclusive : 0;
>  
>       int exclude = eu | ek | eh;
>       int exclude_GH = evsel ? evsel->exclude_GH : 0;
> @@ -1824,6 +1826,8 @@ static int get_event_modifier(struct event_modifier 
> *mod, char *str,
>                       sample_read = 1;
>               } else if (*str == 'D') {
>                       pinned = 1;
> +             } else if (*str == 'e') {
> +                     exclusive = 1;
>               } else if (*str == 'W') {
>                       weak = 1;
>               } else
> @@ -1857,6 +1861,7 @@ static int get_event_modifier(struct event_modifier 
> *mod, char *str,
>       mod->sample_read = sample_read;
>       mod->pinned = pinned;
>       mod->weak = weak;
> +     mod->exclusive = exclusive;
>  
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1912,8 +1917,10 @@ int parse_events__modifier_event(struct list_head 
> *list, char *str, bool add)
>               evsel->precise_max         = mod.precise_max;
>               evsel->weak_group          = mod.weak;
>  
> -             if (evsel__is_group_leader(evsel))
> +             if (evsel__is_group_leader(evsel)) {
>                       evsel->core.attr.pinned = mod.pinned;
> +                     evsel->core.attr.exclusive = mod.exclusive;
> +             }
>       }
>  
>       return 0;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l
> index 3ca5fd2829ca..9db5097317f4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ name_tag  
> [\'][a-zA-Z_*?\[\]][a-zA-Z0-9_*?\-,\.\[\]:=]*[\']
>  name_minus   [a-zA-Z_*?][a-zA-Z0-9\-_*?.:]*
>  drv_cfg_term [a-zA-Z0-9_\.]+(=[a-zA-Z0-9_*?\.:]+)?
>  /* If you add a modifier you need to update check_modifier() */

please update also check_modifier function as the comment
suggests, other than that it looks good to me

thanks,
jrka


> -modifier_event       [ukhpPGHSDIW]+
> +modifier_event       [ukhpPGHSDIWe]+
>  modifier_bp  [rwx]{1,3}
>  
>  %%
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 

Reply via email to