On 11/10/20 8:34 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10 2020 at 07:10, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 05:15:03PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>> [  105.325371] hpet: Lost 9601 RTC interrupts
>>> [  105.485766] hpet: Lost 9600 RTC interrupts
>>> [  105.639182] hpet: Lost 9601 RTC interrupts
>>> [  105.792155] hpet: Lost 9601 RTC interrupts
>>> [  105.947076] hpet: Lost 9601 RTC interrupts
>>> [  106.100876] hpet: Lost 9600 RTC interrupts
>>> [  106.253444] hpet: Lost 9601 RTC interrupts
>>> [  106.406722] hpet: Lost 9601 RTC interrupts
>>>
>>> preventing the system from booting. I bisected it to this commit.
>>
>> I bisected it to the exact same thing too, on an AMD laptop, after seeing 
>> what
>> you're seeing.
> 
> Bah. I'm a moron.
> 
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -809,9 +809,9 @@ static bool irq_is_level(int idx)
>       case MP_IRQTRIG_DEFAULT:
>               /*
>                * Conforms to spec, ie. bus-type dependent trigger
> -              * mode. PCI defaults to egde, ISA to level.
> +              * mode. PCI defaults to level, ISA to edge.
>                */
> -             level = test_bit(bus, mp_bus_not_pci);
> +             level = !test_bit(bus, mp_bus_not_pci);
>               /* Take EISA into account */
>               return eisa_irq_is_level(idx, bus, level);
>       case MP_IRQTRIG_EDGE:
> 

I was about to send the dmesg output when I saw this. A quick test with
this change resolves the boot issue, thanks!

I'm still seeing the warning at arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:2527, but I'll
start a separate thread on that.

Thanks,
Tom

Reply via email to