On Fri, Nov 13 2020 at 22:29, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>
> +enum syscall_work_bit {
> + SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP = 0,
enums start at 0, so why do you need an explicit assignment?
> +};
> +
> +#define _SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP BIT(SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP)
Do we really have to repeat the nonsense from TIF/_TIF in the naming
here? Can we please name this in a way which makes it obvious what is
what?
Thanks,
tglx
