On Mon, Dec 10 2007, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Monday 10 December 2007 05:19, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Precisely. So forgive me for thinking this patch hasn't seen very > > varied testing, that's 2 errors (one simple, one bad - broken was NOT > > a gross exageration, thanks) in very few lines. > > See the [RFC]? If I had meant Request For Flaming, I would have written > that. Thankyou for the catch.
The same mail that contained this part, copied verbatim: "Let me close with perhaps the most relevant remarks: the attached code has been in heavy testing and in production for months now. Thus there is nothing theoretical when I say it works, and the patch speaks for itself in terms of obvious correctness." We must have differing opinions on what obvious correctness is. Future replies to /dev/null, please. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
