When discussing[1] exec and posix file locks it was realized that none
of the callers of get_files_struct fundamentally needed to call
get_files_struct, and that by switching them to helper functions
instead it will both simplify their code and remove unnecessary
increments of files_struct.count.  Those unnecessary increments can
result in exec unnecessarily unsharing files_struct which breaking
posix locks, and it can result in fget_light having to fallback to
fget reducing system performance.

Instead of manually coding finding the files struct for a task and
then calling files_lookup_fd_rcu, use the helper task_lookup_fd_rcu
that combines those to steps.   Making the code simpler and removing
the need to get a reference on a files_struct.

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
---
 fs/proc/fd.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/fd.c b/fs/proc/fd.c
index 3dec44d7c5c5..c1a984f3c4df 100644
--- a/fs/proc/fd.c
+++ b/fs/proc/fd.c
@@ -83,18 +83,13 @@ static const struct file_operations 
proc_fdinfo_file_operations = {
 
 static bool tid_fd_mode(struct task_struct *task, unsigned fd, fmode_t *mode)
 {
-       struct files_struct *files = get_files_struct(task);
        struct file *file;
 
-       if (!files)
-               return false;
-
        rcu_read_lock();
-       file = files_lookup_fd_rcu(files, fd);
+       file = task_lookup_fd_rcu(task, fd);
        if (file)
                *mode = file->f_mode;
        rcu_read_unlock();
-       put_files_struct(files);
        return !!file;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.0

Reply via email to