David Miller wrote: > From: Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:29:23 -0500 > >> Is the netif_running() check even required? > > No, it is not. > > When a device is brought down, one of the first things > that happens is that we wait for all pending NAPI polls > to complete, then block any new polls from starting.
I think this was previously (pre-2.6.24) not the case, which is why e1000 et al has this check as well and that's exactly what is causing most of the net_rx_action oopses in the first place. Without the netif_running() check previously the drivers were just unusable with NAPI and prone to many races with down (i.e. touching some ethtool ioctl which wants to do a reset while routing small packets at high numbers). that's why we added the netif_running() check in the first place :) There might be more drivers lurking that need this change... Auke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
