From: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <[email protected]>

Since commit 28f06f770454 ("cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu structures with
lists"), cppc-cpufreq driver doesn't check availability of PSD data before
registering with cpufreq core. As a result on a ThunderX2 platform when
CPPC is disabled from BIOS, kernel log is spammed with following messages:

[  180.974166] CPPC Cpufreq: Error in acquiring _CPC/_PSD data for CPUxx

acpi_cppc_processor_probe() never succeed in this case because
acpi_evaluate_object_typed("_CPC") always returns AE_NOT_FOUND. When
cpufreq core calls cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(), driver fails to obtain PSD data
and print error messages.

Convert cppc-cpufreq driver to a platform driver (done in a separate patch)
and add cppc-cpufreq device when acpi_cppc_processor_probe() succeeds.

Fixes: 28f06f770454 ("cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu structures with lists")
Reported-by: Petr Cervinka <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index 4e478f751ff7..adf9ca3be9fe 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 #include <linux/ktime.h>
 #include <linux/rwsem.h>
 #include <linux/wait.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
 
 #include <acpi/cppc_acpi.h>
 
@@ -606,6 +607,23 @@ static bool is_cppc_supported(int revision, int num_ent)
        return true;
 }
 
+static void add_cppc_cpufreq_dev(void)
+{
+       static bool already_added;
+
+       if (!already_added) {
+               struct platform_device *pdev;
+
+               pdev = platform_device_register_simple("cppc-cpufreq", -1,
+                               NULL, 0);
+               if (IS_ERR(pdev))
+                       pr_err("Couldn't register cppc-cpufreq err=%ld\n",
+                                       PTR_ERR(pdev));
+               else
+                       already_added = true;
+       }
+}
+
 /*
  * An example CPC table looks like the following.
  *
@@ -815,6 +833,9 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr)
        }
 
        kfree(output.pointer);
+
+       add_cppc_cpufreq_dev();
+
        return 0;
 
 out_free:
-- 
2.26.2

Reply via email to