On 23/12/2020 10:36, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 11:27:05AM +0800, Yejune Deng wrote:
>> The function io_remove_personalities() is very similar to
>> io_unregister_personality(),but the latter has a more reasonable
>> return value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yejune Deng <yejune.d...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> fs/io_uring.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> The patch LGTM, maybe as an alternative you can leave io_remove_personality()
> with the interface needed by idr_for_each() and implement
> io_unregister_personality() calling io_remove_personality() with the right
> parameters.
Right, don't replace sane types with void * just because.
Leave well-typed io_unregister_personality() and call it from
io_remove_personalities().
Also
* idr_for_each() - Iterate through all stored pointers.
...
* If @fn returns anything other than %0, the iteration stops and that
* value is returned from this function.
For io_remove_personality() iod==NULL should not happen because
it's under for_each and synchronised, but leave the return value be
io_remove_personality(void *, ...)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = data;
io_unregister_personality(ctx, id);
return 0;
}
--
Pavel Begunkov
