On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 04:31:55PM -0600, Babu Moger wrote:
> @@ -2549,7 +2559,10 @@ static int svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct
> msr_data *msr_info)
> !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))
> return 1;
>
> - msr_info->data = svm->spec_ctrl;
> + if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_V_SPEC_CTRL))
> + msr_info->data = svm->vmcb->save.spec_ctrl;
> + else
> + msr_info->data = svm->spec_ctrl;
> break;
> case MSR_AMD64_VIRT_SPEC_CTRL:
> if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
> @@ -2640,6 +2653,8 @@ static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct
> msr_data *msr)
> return 1;
>
> svm->spec_ctrl = data;
> + if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_V_SPEC_CTRL))
> + svm->vmcb->save.spec_ctrl = data;
> if (!data)
> break;
>
Are the get/set_msr() accessors such a fast path that they need
static_cpu_has() ?
svm_get_msr() already uses boot_cpu_has() for MSR_TSC_AUX...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
