On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 01:01:42PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > > Thank you very much, very good suggestion, > > Thanks for another positive feedback. > > > > do I need to re-send a patch to fix this problem, or modify the previous > > patch and send it again? > > Please convince the involved contributors to integrate a corrected patch > version. > > * Better indentation. > > * … > >> + if (!map->debugfs_name) > >> + kfree(map->debugfs_name); > > Would this questionable null pointer check result in a memory leak?
Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
