Arnd, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> writes:
> For these I received no reply yet. Again, these will stay for the moment > unless I get a reply, but if anyone has more information, please reply > here to document the status (adding a few more people to Cc): > > * cns3xxx -- added in 2010, last fixed in 2019, probably no users left The following is what I sent to you a week ago. I don't say whether CNS3xxx support should stay or not, of course. Subject: Re: cns3xxx PCIe domain support Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> writes: > For the cns3xxx case, I wonder if anyone actually cares. If > there are still users, the treewide change would make it trivial > to set it up right, while backporting would be harder. I noticed > that openwrt removed cns3xxx support in August with the > explanation that the platform is not used much anymore, > and I suspect that any users outside of openwrt stopped updating > their kernels long ago. I'm still using CNS3xxx-based Gateworks' boards (Laguna), with some custom patch set, but the last kernels are over 2 years old. I have some plan to update, but the probability it will happen very soon is rather low. I guess I will test and, if needed, fix it when the time comes. I'm not using them with OpenWrt, though. They are basically a platform for (the old, parallel, not express) mini-PCI cards and similar stuff. Nothing connected to the Internet etc. -- Krzysztof Halasa Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz Przemysłowy Instytut Automatyki i Pomiarów PIAP Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warszawa
