On 4/02/21 2:05 pm, yann.gaut...@foss.st.com wrote:
> From: Yann Gautier <yann.gaut...@foss.st.com>
> 
> Since [1], the erase argument for mmc_erase() function is saved in
> erase_arg field of card structure. It is preferable to use it instead of
> hard-coded MMC_SECURE_ERASE_ARG, which from eMMC 4.51 spec is not
> recommended:
> "6.6.16 Secure Erase
> NOTE Secure Erase is included for backwards compatibility. New system
> level implementations (based on v4.51 devices and beyond) should use
> Erase combined with Sanitize instead of secure erase."
> 
>  [1] commit 01904ff77676 ("mmc: core: Calculate the discard arg only once")
> 

Did you experience an issue because of this?  You could add that to the
commit message.

There does not seem to be a need for secure erase, so:

Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>


> Signed-off-by: Yann Gautier <yann.gaut...@foss.st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index 39a478874ca3..63524551a13a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -2110,7 +2110,7 @@ static int mmc_test_rw_multiple(struct mmc_test_card 
> *test,
>       if (mmc_can_erase(test->card) &&
>           tdata->prepare & MMC_TEST_PREP_ERASE) {
>               ret = mmc_erase(test->card, dev_addr,
> -                             size / 512, MMC_SECURE_ERASE_ARG);
> +                             size / 512, test->card->erase_arg);
>               if (ret)
>                       ret = mmc_erase(test->card, dev_addr,
>                                       size / 512, MMC_ERASE_ARG);
> 

Reply via email to