On 2/9/21 5:55 AM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: > > s/theroretical/theoretical/ > > Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c > index 3c9c7492252f..aa9d3cf69580 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c > @@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ void irq_force_complete_move(struct irq_desc *desc) > * of the interrupt on the apic/system bus would be delayed > * beyond the point where the target cpu disables interrupts > * in stop machine. I doubt that it can happen, but at least > - * there is a theroretical chance. Virtualization might be > + * there is a theoretical chance. Virtualization might be > * able to expose this, but AFAICT the IOAPIC emulation is not > * as stupid as the real hardware. > * > -- > 2.30.0 > -- ~Randy
