On Fri 19-02-21 12:17:11, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:55:00AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > It is not the lock that I care about but more about counters. The
> > intention was that there is a single place to handle both enqueing and
> > dequeing. As not all places require counters to be updated. E.g. the
> > migration which just replaces one page by another.
>
> I see.
> alloc_fresh_huge_page->prep_new_huge_page increments h->nr_huge_pages{_node}
> counters.
> Which means:
>
> > new_page = alloc_fresh_huge_page();
> > if (!new_page)
> > goto fail;
> > spin_lock(hugetlb_lock);
> > if (!PageHuge(old_page)) {
> > /* freed from under us, nothing to do */
> > __update_and_free_page(new_page);
>
> Here we need update_and_free_page, otherwise we would be leaving a stale value
> in h->nr_huge_pages{_node}.
>
> > goto unlock;
> > }
> > list_del(&old_page->lru);
> > __update_and_free_page(old_page);
>
> Same here.
>
> > __enqueue_huge_page(new_page);
>
> This is ok since h->free_huge_pages{_node} do not need to be updated.
Fair enough. I didn't get to think this through obviously, but you
should get the idea ;)
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
