On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 02:55:30PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 3/1/21 2:26 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 02:19:01AM +0900, Keith Busch wrote: > >> Crashing is bad, silent data corruption is worse. Is there truly no > >> defense against that? If not, why should anyone rely on this? > > > > If we receive an response for which we don't have a started request, we > > know that something is wrong. Couldn't we in just reset the connection > > in this case? We don't have to pretend nothing has happened and > > continuing normally. This would avoid a host crash and would not create > > (more) data corruption. Or I am just too naive? > > > This is actually a sensible solution. > Please send a patch for that.
Is a bad frame a problem that can be resolved with a reset? Even if so, the reset doesn't indicate to the user if previous commands completed with bad data, so it still seems unreliable.