On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 04:18:23PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> CPU0:                                   CPU1:
> 
> objcg = get_obj_cgroup_from_current();
> obj_cgroup_charge(objcg);
>                                         memcg_reparent_objcgs();
>                                             xchg(&objcg->memcg, 
> root_mem_cgroup);
>     // memcg == root_mem_cgroup
>     memcg = obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg);
>     __memcg_kmem_charge(memcg);
>         // Do not charge to the root memcg
>         try_charge(memcg);
> 
> If the objcg->memcg is reparented to the root_mem_cgroup,
> obj_cgroup_charge() can pass root_mem_cgroup as the first
> parameter to here. The root_mem_cgroup is skipped in the
> try_charge(). So the page counters of it do not update.
> 
> When we uncharge this, we will decrease the page counters
> (e.g. memory and memsw) of the root_mem_cgroup. This will
> cause the page counters of the root_mem_cgroup to be out
> of balance. Fix it by charging the page to the
> root_mem_cgroup unconditional.

Is this a problem? It seems that we do not expose root memcg's counters
except kmem and tcp. It seems that the described problem is not
applicable to the kmem counter. Please, explain.

Thanks!

> 
> Fixes: bf4f059954dc ("mm: memcg/slab: obj_cgroup API")
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 2db2aeac8a9e..edf604824d63 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3078,6 +3078,19 @@ static int __memcg_kmem_charge(struct mem_cgroup 
> *memcg, gfp_t gfp,
>       if (ret)
>               return ret;
>  
> +     /*
> +      * If the objcg->memcg is reparented to the root_mem_cgroup,
> +      * obj_cgroup_charge() can pass root_mem_cgroup as the first
> +      * parameter to here. We should charge the page to the
> +      * root_mem_cgroup unconditional to keep it's page counters
> +      * balance.
> +      */
> +     if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))) {
> +             page_counter_charge(&memcg->memory, nr_pages);
> +             if (do_memsw_account())
> +                     page_counter_charge(&memcg->memsw, nr_pages);
> +     }
> +
>       if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) &&
>           !page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->kmem, nr_pages, &counter)) {
>  
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

Reply via email to