On 02/24/21 14:30, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> idle load balance is the only user of update_nohz_stats and doesn't use
> force parameter. Remove it
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index e23709f6854b..f52f4dd3fb9e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -8352,7 +8352,7 @@ group_type group_classify(unsigned int imbalance_pct,
>       return group_has_spare;
>  }
>  
> -static bool update_nohz_stats(struct rq *rq, bool force)
> +static bool update_nohz_stats(struct rq *rq)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
>       unsigned int cpu = rq->cpu;
> @@ -8363,7 +8363,7 @@ static bool update_nohz_stats(struct rq *rq, bool force)
>       if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, nohz.idle_cpus_mask))
>               return false;
>  
> -     if (!force && !time_after(jiffies, rq->last_blocked_load_update_tick))
> +     if (!time_after(jiffies, rq->last_blocked_load_update_tick))
>               return true;
>  
>       update_blocked_averages(cpu);
> @@ -10401,7 +10401,7 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, 
> unsigned int flags,
>  
>               rq = cpu_rq(balance_cpu);
>  
> -             has_blocked_load |= update_nohz_stats(rq, true);
> +             has_blocked_load |= update_nohz_stats(rq);

I think Dietmar commented on this on v1. There's a change in behavior here
AFAICT. Worth expanding the changelog to explain that this will be rate limited
and why it's okay? It'll help a lost soul like me who doesn't have the ins and
outs of this code carved in their head :-)

Thanks

--
Qais Yousef


>  
>               /*
>                * If time for next balance is due,
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Reply via email to