Re: 2.6.24-rc7-rt1: macro "put_cpu_var" passed 2 arguments, but takes just 1

[Steven Rostedt]

On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:

> [... snip ...]
>
> @@ -56,12 +64,13 @@ static inline void __quicklist_free(int
>         struct page *page)
>  {
>         struct quicklist *q;
> +       int cpu;
>
> -       q = &get_cpu_var(quicklist)[nr];
> +       q = &get_cpu_var_locked(quicklist, &cpu)[nr];
>         *(void **)p = q->page;
>         q->page = p;
>         q->nr_pages++;
> -       put_cpu_var(quicklist);
> +       put_cpu_var(quicklist, cpu); <------------- should that be 
> put_cpu_var_locked()?
>  }
>

Ouch! <looks at rejs>

*************** static inline void __quicklist_free(int
*** 76,86 ****
                return;
        }

-       q = &get_cpu_var(quicklist)[nr];
        *(void **)p = q->page;
        q->page = p;
        q->nr_pages++;
-       put_cpu_var(quicklist);
  }

  static inline void quicklist_free(int nr, void (*dtor)(void *), void *pp)
--- 73,83 ----
                return;
        }

+       q = &get_cpu_var_locked(quicklist, &cpu)[nr];
        *(void **)p = q->page;
        q->page = p;
        q->nr_pages++;
+       put_cpu_var_locked(quicklist, cpu);
  }

  static inline void quicklist_free(int nr, void (*dtor)(void *), void *pp)
************

Darn, that was my fault. OK, will release a -rt2 soon.

Thanks,

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/