On March 21, 2021 4:31:08 PM PDT, Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]> 
wrote:
>
>s/sructure/structure/
>s/extention/extension/
>s/offerred/offered/
>s/adversley/adversely/
>
>Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

>---
> include/linux/hyperv.h | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/hyperv.h b/include/linux/hyperv.h
>index f1d74dcf0353..2c18c8e768ef 100644
>--- a/include/linux/hyperv.h
>+++ b/include/linux/hyperv.h
>@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ struct vmbus_channel_offer {
>
>               /*
>                * Pipes:
>-               * The following sructure is an integrated pipe protocol, which
>+               * The following structure is an integrated pipe protocol, which
>                * is implemented on top of standard user-defined data. Pipe
>                * clients have MAX_PIPE_USER_DEFINED_BYTES left for their own
>                * use.
>@@ -883,11 +883,11 @@ struct vmbus_channel {
>        * Support for sub-channels. For high performance devices,
>        * it will be useful to have multiple sub-channels to support
>        * a scalable communication infrastructure with the host.
>-       * The support for sub-channels is implemented as an extention
>+       * The support for sub-channels is implemented as an extension
>        * to the current infrastructure.
>        * The initial offer is considered the primary channel and this
>        * offer message will indicate if the host supports sub-channels.
>-       * The guest is free to ask for sub-channels to be offerred and can
>+       * The guest is free to ask for sub-channels to be offered and can
>        * open these sub-channels as a normal "primary" channel. However,
>        * all sub-channels will have the same type and instance guids as the
>        * primary channel. Requests sent on a given channel will result in a
>@@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ struct vmbus_channel {
>        * Clearly, these optimizations improve throughput at the expense of
>        * latency. Furthermore, since the channel is shared for both
>        * control and data messages, control messages currently suffer
>-       * unnecessary latency adversley impacting performance and boot
>+       * unnecessary latency adversely impacting performance and boot
>        * time. To fix this issue, permit tagging the channel as being
>        * in "low latency" mode. In this mode, we will bypass the monitor
>        * mechanism.
>--
>2.31.0


-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Reply via email to