On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 01:10:51PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> To answer your questions, there is a SoC vendor thermal daemon using
> >> DTPM and there is a tool created to watch the thermal framework and read
> >> the DTPM values, it is available at [4]. It is currently under
> >> development with the goal of doing power rebalancing / capping across
> >> the different nodes when there is a violation of the parent's power limit.
> > 
> > Crazy ideas aside, your implementation of this is my main objection
> > here.  You are creating a user/kernel api that you will have to support
> > for 20+ years, without a real userspace user just yet (from what I can
> > tell).  That's rough, and is going to mean that this gets messy over
> > time.
> 
> I'm not sure to understand, the API already exists since v3.3, it is the
> powercap and DTPM is its backend. AFAICT, there are already users of it
> except they create their own way to build the hierarchy today.

The configfs api is what I am referring to here, the ones in this patch
series...

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply via email to