[PATCH v3 04/12] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Reorder remove()

[Douglas Anderson]

Let's make the remove() function strictly the reverse of the probe()
function so it's easier to reason about.

This patch was created by code inspection and should move us closer to
a proper remove.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.ha...@samsung.com>
---

Changes in v3:
- Removed "NOTES" from commit message.

 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index 76f43af6735d..c006678c9921 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -1315,20 +1315,21 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_remove(struct i2c_client 
*client)
        if (!pdata)
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       kfree(pdata->edid);
-       ti_sn_debugfs_remove(pdata);
-
-       of_node_put(pdata->host_node);
-
-       pm_runtime_disable(pdata->dev);
-
        if (pdata->dsi) {
                mipi_dsi_detach(pdata->dsi);
                mipi_dsi_device_unregister(pdata->dsi);
        }
 
+       kfree(pdata->edid);
+
+       ti_sn_debugfs_remove(pdata);
+
        drm_bridge_remove(&pdata->bridge);
 
+       pm_runtime_disable(pdata->dev);
+
+       of_node_put(pdata->host_node);
+
        return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.31.0.208.g409f899ff0-goog