In the binding:
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - hycon,hycon-hy4613
> +      - hycon,hycon-hy4614
> +      - hycon,hycon-hy4621
> +      - hycon,hycon-hy4623
> +      - hycon,hycon-hy4633
> +      - hycon,hycon-hy4635

In the example:
> +      hycon-hy4633@1c {
> +        compatible = "hycon,hy4633";
> +        reg = <0x1c>;
> +        interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>;
> +        interrupts = <5 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> +        reset-gpios = <&gpio2 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +      };


Rob's devicetree lint bot detected the mismatch in compatible string
here.

I personally think 'hycon,hy4633' looks better than 'hycon,hycon-hy4633',
because it isn't so redundant.


Best regards,
Jonathan Neuschäfer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to