On 2021/4/8 7:04, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Reason for temp variable is for me it's confusing to see statement like >> "rate_khz = rate_khz / 1000". > > Yes. And with this clearer calculation, we can maybe skip the HZ_PER_KHZ > define completely and just use plain '1000' as a factor/divider because > it then becomes obvious. I still find the define more confusing than > helpful TBH. But I'll leave the final decision to Yicong Yang. >
HZ_PER_KHZ macro are defined separately in other places of the kernel. Andy suggested to have this defined and used so that one day we can factor this macro out to the public. :)
