On Saturday, April 10, 2021 11:31:16 AM CEST Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:22:32AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > Change the type of fw_current_in_ps_mode from u8 to bool, because
> > it is used everywhere as a bool and, accordingly, it should be
> > declared as a bool. Shorten the controlling
> > expression of an 'if' statement.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrance...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c
> > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c index
> > 96fe172ced8d..8dc4dd8c6d4c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c
> > @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ void rtw_hal_dm_watchdog(struct adapter *padapter)
> >
> > void rtw_hal_dm_watchdog_in_lps(struct adapter *padapter)
> > {
> >
> > - if (adapter_to_pwrctl(padapter)->fw_current_in_ps_mode == true)
{
> > + if (adapter_to_pwrctl(padapter)->fw_current_in_ps_mode) {
> >
> > if (padapter->HalFunc.hal_dm_watchdog_in_lps)
> >
> > padapter-
>HalFunc.hal_dm_watchdog_in_lps(padapter); /* this
> > function caller is in interrupt context
*/>
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h
> > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h index
> > 0a48f1653be5..0767dbb84199 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h
> > @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ struct pwrctrl_priv {
> >
> > u8 LpsIdleCount;
> > u8 power_mgnt;
> > u8 org_power_mgnt;
> >
> > - u8 fw_current_in_ps_mode;
> > + bool fw_current_in_ps_mode;
> >
> > unsigned long DelayLPSLastTimeStamp;
> > s32 pnp_current_pwr_state;
> > u8 pnp_bstop_trx;
>
> If this is only checked, how can it ever be true? Who ever sets this
> value?
>
You're right. It is not set, therefore the "if" control expression cannot
ever be "true".
Can I delete this statement in a new patch? Or you prefer I send the whole
series again with this change in patch 4/4?
Thanks,
Fabio
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
