On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:51 PM Michal Wilczynski
<michal.wilczyn...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Currently logic for installing notifications from ACPI devices is
> implemented using notify callback in struct acpi_driver. Preparations
> are being made to replace acpi_driver with more generic struct
> platform_driver, which doesn't contain notify callback. Furthermore
> as of now handlers are being called indirectly through
> acpi_notify_device(), which decreases performance.
>
> Call acpi_dev_install_notify_handler() at the end of .add() callback.
> Call acpi_dev_remove_notify_handler() at the beginning of .remove()
> callback. Change arguments passed to the notify function to match with
> what's required by acpi_install_notify_handler(). Remove .notify
> callback initialization in acpi_driver.
>
> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczyn...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
> index 62f4364e4460..60b7013d0009 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(video_list_lock);
> static LIST_HEAD(video_bus_head);
> static int acpi_video_bus_add(struct acpi_device *device);
> static void acpi_video_bus_remove(struct acpi_device *device);
> -static void acpi_video_bus_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event);
> +static void acpi_video_bus_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data);
>
> /*
> * Indices in the _BCL method response: the first two items are special,
> @@ -104,7 +104,6 @@ static struct acpi_driver acpi_video_bus = {
> .ops = {
> .add = acpi_video_bus_add,
> .remove = acpi_video_bus_remove,
> - .notify = acpi_video_bus_notify,
> },
> };
>
> @@ -1527,12 +1526,15 @@ static int acpi_video_bus_stop_devices(struct
> acpi_video_bus *video)
> acpi_osi_is_win8() ? 0 : 1);
> }
>
> -static void acpi_video_bus_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
> +static void acpi_video_bus_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
> {
> - struct acpi_video_bus *video = acpi_driver_data(device);
> + struct acpi_device *device = data;
> + struct acpi_video_bus *video;
> struct input_dev *input;
> int keycode = 0;
>
> + video = acpi_driver_data(device);
> +
> if (!video || !video->input)
> return;
>
> @@ -2053,8 +2055,20 @@ static int acpi_video_bus_add(struct acpi_device
> *device)
>
> acpi_video_bus_add_notify_handler(video);
>
> + error = acpi_dev_install_notify_handler(device,
> + ACPI_DEVICE_NOTIFY,
> + acpi_video_bus_notify);
> + if (error)
> + goto err_remove_and_unregister_video;
This label name is a bit too long and the second half of it doesn't
really add any value IMV. err_remove would be sufficient.
> +
> return 0;
>
> +err_remove_and_unregister_video:
> + mutex_lock(&video_list_lock);
> + list_del(&video->entry);
> + mutex_unlock(&video_list_lock);
> + acpi_video_bus_remove_notify_handler(video);
> + acpi_video_bus_unregister_backlight(video);
> err_put_video:
> acpi_video_bus_put_devices(video);
> kfree(video->attached_array);
> @@ -2075,6 +2089,10 @@ static void acpi_video_bus_remove(struct acpi_device
> *device)
>
> video = acpi_driver_data(device);
>
> + acpi_dev_remove_notify_handler(device,
> + ACPI_DEVICE_NOTIFY,
> + acpi_video_bus_notify);
> +
> mutex_lock(&video_list_lock);
> list_del(&video->entry);
> mutex_unlock(&video_list_lock);
> --
> 2.41.0
>
