On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 11:39 AM Wilczynski, Michal
<michal.wilczyn...@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/29/2023 5:55 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:51 PM Michal Wilczynski
> > <michal.wilczyn...@intel.com> wrote:
> >> Currently logic for installing notifications from ACPI devices is
> >> implemented using notify callback in struct acpi_driver. Preparations
> >> are being made to replace acpi_driver with more generic struct
> >> platform_driver, which doesn't contain notify callback. Furthermore
> >> as of now handlers are being called indirectly through
> >> acpi_notify_device(), which decreases performance.
> >>
> >> Call acpi_dev_install_notify_handler() at the end of .add() callback.
> >> Call acpi_dev_remove_notify_handler() at the beginning of .remove()
> >> callback. Change arguments passed to the notify function to match with
> >> what's required by acpi_install_notify_handler(). Remove .notify
> >> callback initialization in acpi_driver.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczyn...@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/acpi/ac.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ac.c b/drivers/acpi/ac.c
> >> index 1ace70b831cd..207ee3c85bad 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/ac.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/ac.c
> >> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >>
> >> static int acpi_ac_add(struct acpi_device *device);
> >> static void acpi_ac_remove(struct acpi_device *device);
> >> -static void acpi_ac_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event);
> >> +static void acpi_ac_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data);
> >>
> >> static const struct acpi_device_id ac_device_ids[] = {
> >> {"ACPI0003", 0},
> >> @@ -54,11 +54,9 @@ static struct acpi_driver acpi_ac_driver = {
> >> .name = "ac",
> >> .class = ACPI_AC_CLASS,
> >> .ids = ac_device_ids,
> >> - .flags = ACPI_DRIVER_ALL_NOTIFY_EVENTS,
> >> .ops = {
> >> .add = acpi_ac_add,
> >> .remove = acpi_ac_remove,
> >> - .notify = acpi_ac_notify,
> >> },
> >> .drv.pm = &acpi_ac_pm,
> >> };
> >> @@ -128,9 +126,12 @@ static enum power_supply_property ac_props[] = {
> >> };
> >>
> >> /* Driver Model */
> >> -static void acpi_ac_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
> >> +static void acpi_ac_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
> >> {
> >> - struct acpi_ac *ac = acpi_driver_data(device);
> > This line doesn't need to be changed. Just add the device variable
> > definition above it.
> >
> > And the same pattern is present in the other patches in the series.
>
> I like the Reverse Christmas Tree, but sure will change that
I do too, but in the cases when it costs 3 extra lines of code I'd
rather have something simpler.
